![\"\"](\"https:\/\/teamcubation.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ia-developers2.jpg\")
Credits: DALL\u00b7E 3 (https:\/\/openai.com\/index\/dall-e-3\/)<\/p><\/div>\n
In the short term, AI won\u2019t take your job, but not incorporating AI tools could leave you without one in the medium term\u2014just like failing to keep up with new languages, frameworks, and trends in software development (which has been happening for the past 40 years). Think of AI tools as a new technology that has emerged in the market\u2014one you should adopt to stay up to date. The best thing you can do is learn to integrate AI tools organically to improve the work you\u2019re doing today.<\/p>\n
AI Tools for Developers<\/h4>\n
Now, if I\u2019ve convinced you so far, you might be wondering: Which of the hundreds of AI tools for software development should I use?<\/em> The answer, as in many cases, is: it depends<\/strong>. On what? Your seniority, the type of developer you are, your preferences, and several other factors. We\u2019ll analyze some scenarios later.<\/p>\n But first, let\u2019s take a quick look at the types of AI-assisted development tools available on the market today. Below we provide a non-exhaustive summary of the main categories of AI-powered developer assistance tools, along with some examples of each:<\/p>\n Chatbots<\/span> Examples: ChatGPT<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Claude<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Gemini<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Grok<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Perplexity<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Microsoft Copilot<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Deepseek<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n Autocompletion Assistants in IDEs<\/strong><\/span> Examples: GitHub Copilot<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Supermaven<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Codeium Supercomplete<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n Code-Generating IDEs<\/strong><\/span> Examples: Cursor<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Windsurf<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Trae<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n Webs\/SaaS Platforms<\/strong><\/span> Examples: v0 (de Vercel)<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Lovable<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Replit<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Bolt<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n APIs<\/strong><\/span> Examples: OpenAI<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Anthropic<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Google\/Gemini<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Grok<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n Libraries for Building AI Agents<\/strong><\/span> Examples: PydanticAI<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>LangChain<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>AutoGen<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>CrewAI<\/span><\/a>, <\/span>Agno<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n A special note goes to the category of “Full IDEs with Code Generation.”<\/strong> These IDEs are currently very popular (as of March 2025) because many people use them for the well-known “Vibe Coding.”<\/em> This means describing the requirements of a software product in plain text, letting the IDE generate the entire code, testing it, tweaking the prompt if necessary, and continuing to iterate this way\u2014without stopping to review, understand, or correct the generated code. Instead, developers trust the AI and keep “programming” based on what feels right. <\/em>The term was coined by Andrej Karpathy, one of OpenAI’s founders, in this post on X<\/a>.<\/p>\n If you’re wondering what a vibe coding<\/em> developer looks like, imagine something like this:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Credits: Reddit<\/p><\/div>\n If you’re a software developer, you’re probably wondering\u2014after that mountain of tools we just summarized\u2014what exactly should I be using?<\/em><\/p>\n As we mentioned earlier, the answer is highly personal. However, below are some general recommendations<\/strong> for AI tools based on your level of seniority. Of course, everything can be adjusted according to your preferences, needs, project type, technologies used, and other factors.<\/p>\n Credits: Google ImageFX (https:\/\/labs.google\/fx\/tools\/image-fx)<\/p><\/div>\n In this case, we recommend using AI tools with great caution and limitation. Keep in mind that you’re likely learning multiple things at the same time\u2014a programming language, a framework, programming theory, and more. Overusing AI at this stage can hinder your learning process, but there\u2019s good news: it can also empower and accelerate your journey to becoming a better developer.<\/p>\n At this point, the best approach is to primarily rely on tools from the “Chats”<\/strong> category and take advantage of their conversational capabilities to use them as mentors in your learning process. While they can\u2019t fully replace a great human mentor, they can complement your learning. Make use of the chat\u2019s memory<\/strong> to have extended conversations, digging into anything you don\u2019t understand or find unclear. Instead of using prompts like: \u201cGenerate a React component for a to-do list.<\/em>\u201d you can use prompts that encourage learning, such as: \u201cPlease explain step by step how to write a React component for a to-do list. Walk me through the code line by line.<\/em>\u201d After reading the response in detail, you can ask follow-up questions about any parts that are unclear. This way, you can use AI as your personal programming tutor.<\/p>\n It\u2019s not advisable to rely too much on other tools at this stage, but “Autocomplete Assistants in IDEs”<\/strong> can be useful for writing self-documented code. For example, with GitHub Copilot, in a new file, you could write the following comment:<\/p>\n \/* Fetch all users from the database, sort them by last name in memory, then transform them into a JSON, commenting on each line of code*\/<\/span><\/p>\n After this comment, GitHub Copilot will start generating the code. This is convenient because you don\u2019t have to leave the IDE, and the comments can help you understand the generated code. However, chat-based AI tools tend to be more effective for these types of tasks since they allow for follow-up questions.<\/p>\n As you progress in your career, you can start incorporating other AI tools when you feel confident in your ability to understand the code that chat tools generate.<\/p>\n In this case, the previous recommendations still apply, but it’s also advisable to start enabling autocomplete tools in your preferred IDE. However, always make sure to read, understand, and validate<\/strong> the generated code instead of blindly accepting it. The goal is to leverage AI tools to speed up development while continuing to learn and acquire new knowledge.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also a good idea to start using chat-based AI tools<\/strong> to generate small components, functions, or classes\u2014things you could write from memory or by quickly referencing documentation, but that an LLM can generate even faster.<\/p>\n Again, never forget to read the code, understand it, test it, and document anything that isn\u2019t obvious<\/strong>. LLMs make mistakes and sometimes produce nonsensical output, which can introduce bugs without you realizing it.<\/p>\n Another interesting way to use AI at this stage of your career is to ask it to review your code and provide recommendations before submitting a Pull\/Merge Request<\/strong>. You can do this by copying and pasting your code into a chat tool or using AI-powered code review tools integrated into your IDE.<\/p>\n Similarly, you can ask these tools to write unit tests for your code<\/strong>. You could even describe a problem and ask the AI to generate only the test cases, so you can complete the code and validate it by ensuring the tests pass (AI-guided TDD<\/strong>). This can be a great way to challenge yourself and improve your mastery of the language or framework you’re working with.<\/p>\n At this stage, we assume you have a solid grasp of the languages, libraries, and frameworks you work with, so you can freely use any of the AI tools we\u2019ve discussed. In particular, AI-powered IDEs<\/strong> can significantly boost your productivity and help you become a “10x Engineer<\/a>.” However, be mindful: it\u2019s important to review the generated code<\/strong>, not just to ensure it meets your requirements but also to maintain a deep understanding of the codebase you\u2019re building and to validate its robustness and quality. The less you understand the code you’re writing, the closer you get to “vibe coding”<\/strong>, which increases risks (we\u2019ll discuss this more at the end of the article).<\/p>\n As we\u2019ve mentioned, preferences are highly personal<\/strong>. For example, the author of this article prefers to write function\/class\/component headers first<\/strong> and let autocomplete tools generate the initial code, accepting what aligns with the intended logic and manually adjusting anything that doesn\u2019t. This approach allows AI-assisted coding while still guiding the structure, form, and style<\/strong> of the code. However, in some cases, it\u2019s more convenient to simply ask a chat-based AI<\/strong> to generate what you need\u2014like writing a regular expression to validate an email\u2014and copy-paste the result into your code.<\/p>\n As a general recommendation for any Senior developer<\/strong>, we suggest testing at least one tool from each category<\/strong> for a while to determine what works best for you and to what extent you prefer using them. The goal is to find the optimal set of tools that help you work as efficiently as possible while continuing to enjoy coding<\/strong>.<\/p>\n As we\u2019ve mentioned throughout this article, overusing AI tools for development comes with some risks. Here are a few key concerns:<\/p>\n Regarding the risk of maintainability issues, one might think: I won\u2019t need to maintain the code because AI can always do it for me\u2014in other words, I don\u2019t need to understand the code if AI understands it for me.<\/em> This is true to some extent and could work if one is willing to rely heavily on AI. However, as a product grows, it becomes increasingly difficult to sustain and achieve good results. In such cases, it is recommended to document design, functional, and architectural decisions and provide these files to AI models. Typically, .MD files<\/strong> are used to write this documentation within the project, along with specific configuration files like .cursorrules<\/strong> in Cursor, which indicate where the documentation is located and define templates for standard files. This article<\/a> explores these strategies in more depth. While this development approach is possible, it is still in its early stages, and the long-term maintainability of AI-generated code remains uncertain<\/strong>. It is also unclear whether LLMs\u2019 memory windows can effectively handle large codebases<\/strong>\u2014as the code volume grows, they tend to make more mistakes.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>These are interactive chat models where you can converse with a text-generation model (LLM), like the well-known ChatGPT. While they aren\u2019t specifically designed for developers, we include them because they are among the most widely used and are almost all optimized for code generation.<\/p>\n
\nThese are assistants integrated into popular IDEs, usually available as plugins, that suggest code while you type. Some, like GitHub Copilot, have evolved into embedded chat assistants that allow you to enter specific prompts, overlapping with the next category.<\/p>\n
\nThese are fully-featured IDEs that come with built-in capabilities to generate code and even entire applications.<\/p>\n
\nThese tools function similarly to the previous category but are web-based instead of standalone applications. They allow users to generate complete applications using prompts and, in many cases, deploy them as well.<\/p>\n
\nThis category includes low-level APIs (usually REST) that provide programmatic access to LLMs.<\/p>\n
\nThese are code libraries designed to help developers create autonomous agents that can perform tasks supported by AI models.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/teamcubation.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ia-developers3.jpg\")
So, What Should I Use?<\/h4>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/teamcubation.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ia-developers4.png\")
What Should I Use If I\u2019m a {seniority} Developer?<\/h4>\n
If {seniority} == \u201cJunior\/Trainee\u201d<\/h5>\n
If {seniority} == \u201cSemi Senior\u201d<\/h5>\n
If {seniority} == \u201cSenior\u201d<\/h5>\n
Risks<\/h4>\n
\n